by David Broockman, University of California, Berkeley, and
Christopher Skovron,
University of Michigan
To be effective, representative democracy requires that
elected legislators understand what their
constituents believe and want – and American politicians
regularly declare that they are
championing the priorities of voters in their districts.But
are they? In late 2012, prior to the
November elections, we surveyed nearly 2,000 candidates
running for state legislative offices
estimate the percentage of the people in their districts who
would agree that:
• same-sex marriage should be legal
• the federal government should implement a universal
healthcare program
• all federal welfare programs should be abolished
We then used a large national survey and information about
the characteristics of the voters in
each district to estimate whether the voters truly supported
each issue in each place. We found
major disconnects between voters and their would-be elected
representatives, and our findings
raise important questions about the health of U.S. democracy
and what might be done to make
politics more truly representative.
A Disconnect between Legislators and Constituents
When we compare what legislators believe their constituents
want to their constituents’ actual
views, we discover that politicians hold remarkably
inaccurate perceptions. Pick an American
state legislator at random, and chances are that he or she
will have massive misperceptions about
district views on big-ticket issues, typically missing the
mark by 15 percentage points.
What is more, the mistakes legislators make tend to fall in
one direction, giving U.S. politics a
rightward tilt compared to what most voters say they want.
As the following figures show,
legislators usually believe their constituents are more
conservative than they actually are. Our
attitude measurements are most accurate on the questions
about same sex marriage and universal
health insurance – and in both instances the legislators’
guesses about their constituents’ views
were 15-20 percent more conservative, on average, than the
true public support for same-sex
marriage or universal health care present in their
districts. Read more in David Broockman and Christopher Skovron, “What
Politicians Believe about Their Constituents:
Asymmetric Misperceptions and Prospects for Constituency
Control,” University of California, Berkeley, March
2013.
www.scholarsstrategynetwork.org September 2013
Breaking down misperceptions by the leanings of legislators
reveals further imbalances:
• The typical conservative legislator overestimates his or
her district’s conservatism by a
whopping 20 percentage points. Indeed, he or she believes the
district is even more
conservative than the most right-leaning district in the
entire country.
• Liberals also think their constituents’ views are more
conservative than they really are, but
are typically only off by about five percentage points.
• Most conservative legislators believe their positions on
same-sex marriage and health care
command majority support in their districts – but only
two-fifths are correct. In contrast,
liberal legislators usually share views with constituents,
but one in five does not know it.
Can Politicians Learn to Better Understand Their
Constituents?
Our study also found that politicians don’t learn in the
normal course of events. After November
2012, we posed the same questions again to some candidates.
Even after conducting campaigns
and seeing the results, politicians did not arrive at more
accurate perceptions of constituent views
– not even those who had spent more time talking to voters.
Much remains to be learned about
why U.S. legislators think constituents are more
conservative than they truly are, but researchers
have found that politically active citizens tend to be
wealthier and more conservative than others.
Politicians who want to represent all the people in their
districts need to keep this in mind.
Our findings also suggest that progressive groups might be
able to use a simple lobbying strategy
– just let legislators know the truth about what their
constituents think and want! Most of the
time, legislators will discover that their constituents are
more liberal than they suppose. Would
that lead to policy change? It is an open question, but some
research suggests that public opinion
can influence what politicians do. Perhaps helping
representatives perceive their constituents
correctly could pave the way for public policies closer to
what Americans really want.
This article seems to assume that all elected officials actually want to represent all their constituents, rather than the smaller number of wealthy donors who keep them in the money. We can't ignore the fact that there are just too many who seek office for the wrong reasons and will listen to the "politically active citizens tend to be wealthier and more conservative than others" before paying any heed to the majority, who he or she believes might not turn out at the polls anyway.
ReplyDeleteEven those with initial good intentions get swept up in the constant campaigning mode, where the wealthier citizen seems to have the louder voice.
Get the grotesque sums of money out of the campaign picture and we might have a better chance at having a representative government.