Google and the miseducation of Dylann Roof


The Miseducation of Dylann Roof




SPLC video explains how Google's search algorithm spreads racist propaganda
How did Dylann Roof go from being someone who was not raised in a racist home to someone so steeped in white supremacist propaganda that he murdered nine African Americans during a Bible study?

The answer lies, at least in part, in the way that fragile minds can be shaped by the algorithm that powers Google Search.

It lies in the way Google's algorithm can promote false propaganda written by extremists at the expense of accurate information from reputable sources.



Roof's radicalization began, as he later wrote in an online manifesto, when he typed the words "black on White crime" into Google and found what he described as "pages upon pages of these brutal black on White murders."

The first web pages he found were produced by the Council of Conservative Citizens, a crudely racist group that once called black people a "retrograde species of humanity." Roof wrote that he has "never been the same since that day." As he delved deeper, because of the way Google's search algorithm worked, he was immersed in hate materials.

Google says its algorithm takes into account how trustworthy, reputable or authoritative a source is.

In Roof's case, it clearly did not.

Roof was convicted and sentenced to death in the June 17, 2015, massacre at the historic Emanuel A.M.E. Church in Charleston.

But there are many others who may be susceptible to the kind of racist propaganda that 

http://footprintsstrategies.comad

Disgusting Pedophile Bishop Eddie Long Dead Of Cancer


Image result for Bishop Eddie Long Dead Of Cancer


Bishop Eddie Long, senior pastor of the New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Lithonia, Georgia, died Sunday after a battle with cancer. He was 63. The death was announced by the church. “I am confident through my belief in God that my husband is now resting in a better place. Although, his transition leaves a void…

40 Year Old D.B. Cooper Case may be solved soon



It was “one of the longest and most exhaustive investigations” in FBI history — and to this day remains the only unsolved skyjacking in the United States.
In 1971, a well-dressed passenger hijacked a Northwest Orient flight, demanded $200,000 and later escaped by parachuting out of the back of the plane with the ransom money.
But who exactly was “D.B. Cooper,” the mysterious man who managed to pull off the heist and disappear without a trace?
More than four decades later, three amateur scientists think they may have found evidence that would narrow down Cooper’s identity to that of an aerospace engineer or a manager.
The scientists, working for a group called Citizen Sleuths, said they have been analyzing particles found on a clip-on necktie that Cooper left on his seat — 18E — before jumping out of the plane.

One afternoon a day before Thanksgiving in 1971, a guy calling himself Dan Cooper (the media mistakenly called him D.B. Cooper) boarded Northwest Airlines flight #305 in Portland bound for Seattle. He was wearing a dark suit and a black tie and was described as a business-executive type. While in the air, he opened his brief case showing a bomb to the flight attendant and hijacked the plane. The plane landed in Seattle where he demanded 200K in cash, four parachutes and food for the crew before releasing all the passengers. With only three pilots and one flight attendant left on board, they took off from Seattle with the marked bills heading south while it was dark and lightly raining. In the 45 minutes after takeoff, Cooper sent the flight attendant to the cockpit while donning the parachute, tied the bank bag full of twenty dollar bills to himself, lowered the rear stairs and somewhere north of Portland jumped into the night. When the plane landed with the stairs down, they found the two remaining parachutes and on the seat Cooper was sitting in, a black tie.
Jets, a helicopter and a C-130 aircraft had been scrambled from the closest air force base to follow Cooper's plane. The military was called in days after the hijacking and approximately 1,000 troops searched the suspected jump zone on foot and in helicopters. The Boeing 727 used in the hijacking was flown out over the ocean and the stairs lowered and weights dropped in an attempt to determine when Cooper jumped. The SR-71 super-secret spy plane was sent in to photograph the entire flight path but no sign of D.B. Cooper was ever discovered.
Nine years later in 1980 just north of Portland on the Columbia River, a young boy named Brian Ingram was digging a fire pit in the sand at a place called Tena Bar. He uncovered three bundles of cash a couple inches below the surface, with rubber bands still intact. There was a total of $5800, the Cooper serial numbers matched, and the first evidence since 1971 came to light. The FBI searched and analyzed the beach, the river was dredged by Cooper Hunters and the theories on how the money got there supercharged the Legend of D.B. Cooper.
Decades passed, D.B. Cooper became famous in book, movie and song. In 2007, Special Agent Larry Carr took on his favorite case with the restriction not to waste government time or money pursuing it. Agent Carr brilliantly decided the way around the problem was to treat the hijacking like one of his bank robbery cases - to get as much information out to the public as possible. He released previously unknown facts about the case and the D.B. Cooper frenzy started anew. In 2008 the Cooper Research Team came together to take up the challenge and was given special access to investigate the case. This website is the result of that three year investigation.

The Public Debates You Should Know About Before Reading this Website
The D.B. Cooper case continues to be debated in forums and chat rooms around the world. Most of the conversation (and arguments) center around a few ideas outlined below. The 'Debate Factor' is the level of interest for that theory among Cooper followers.

Did Cooper die in the jump?  It is a huge public debate if Cooper died in the jump or not. Experienced skydivers say he would have died if it was his first jump but if he was an expert, no problem. One experience parachutist believed that anyone who had six or seven practice jumps could accomplished the jump. The cold weather may or may not have killed him in the woods even if he landed ok. No body or parachute was ever found. Debate factor* = 9 of 10
Was Cooper an experienced skydiver?  He requested "front and back parachutes" = novice. He turned down instructions on how to use the parachute = experienced. He picked the non-steerable military parachute = novice. The military chute could better withstand the exit speed of the plane = experienced. He put the parachute on like he knew what he was doing = experienced. He took the reserve chute that was sewn closed and non-functional = novice. Debate factor = 7 of 10
The Tena Bar money find is problematic because it is 20 miles away from the town of Ariel, Washington where the drop zone analysis completed in 1971 said he jumped. In order to get the money on to Tena Bar, several theories are in play. First is the Washougal Washdown Theory, based on the idea that the money had to wash first down smaller rivers, then into the Columbia River in order to end up on Tena Bar. Second is that the FBI flight path was incorrect and Cooper actually landed on Tena Bar and buried the money. Third is that Cooper or someone else buried the money on Tena Bar to throw off the FBI. Debate factor = 10 of 10
The "Palmer Report" stemmed from the FBI bringing in Portland State University geologist Dr. Leonard Palmer to analyze the sand bar where the money was found. In between the 1971 hijacking and the 1980 money find, the Columbia River was dredged and sand was deposited on Tena Bar in 1974. Palmer's report determined that the money was in a layer of top sand laid down by the dredging. This implied that the money was somewhere else upstream for years before coming to rest on Tena Bar. The counterpoint was that the delicate rubber bands were still intact on the bundles when found. The bands pointed to an earlier time frame for the money coming to rest on Tena. Debate factor = 9 of 10
Where was the real flight path?  The flight path map in the FBI archive has no information on who drew the flight path or when it was created. The flight path as drawn is thought to be from the detailed analysis of radar data and flight recorder discussed in the FBI transcripts. The FBI path does NOT fly over Tena Bar or the Washougal area. The money found on Tena Bar forces the flight path debate because it would be much easier to explain the money find if Cooper flew over Tena Bar and jumped, or flight #305 flew over the Washougal River and Cooper's ransom money ended up washing down stream. Debate factor = 7 of 10
How did three loose bundles of money stay together for years and then get buried together? Several possibilities have been put forth. The bank bag protected them for years in the river and then rotted away before the bills did. Cooper lost the money when he landed on Tena Bar in the dark. Someone else buried the money there. Debate factor = 5 of 10
Was Cooper from the area? He recognized Tacoma from the air = local. He would be an idiot to hijack an airplane where he could possibly be recognized = not local. He made the very unusual request for "negotiable American currency" unlike most Americans = not from this country. Debate factor = 3 of 10
How did the money degrade around the edges and get holes in them? Roots, tumbling downstream, dredging? Debate factor = 3 of 10
Are any of the current crop of suspects the real D.B. Cooper? Debate factor = 13+ of 10


Source //citizensleuths.com

http://footprintsstrategies.comad

Fromer Spy says FBI ignored Report Of Trump's Blackmail by the Russians for months

Image result for james comey

Friday we heard that Congressional Democrats came out of a meeting with FBI Director James Comey incensed and questioning his integrity and ability to lead the organization. Here may be one of the reasons why:
According to a new exclusive report in the UK’s Independent newspaper, former MI6 agent Christopher Steele became so alarmed at the national security threat Donald Trump’s Russian ties posed to the US and the UK, he turned over copies of his findings to both British and American intelligence way back in July and continued working on the case without pay even after the election in November.
But after months of inaction, the report says
...Mr Steele became increasingly frustrated that the FBI was failing to take action on the intelligence from others as well as him. He came to believe there was a cover-up, that a cabal within the Bureau blocked a thorough inquiry into Mr Trump, focusing instead on the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails. 
It is believed that a colleague of Mr Steele in Washington, Glenn Simpson, a former Wall Street Journal reporter who runs the firm Fusion GPS, felt the same way and, at the end also continued with the Trump case without being paid.
Steele sent repeated and increasingly urgent memos to the FBI throughout the summer, finally compiling them all into one document (the dossier published on Buzzfeed). This was sent to the FBI in September.
But there seemed to be little progress in a proper inquiry into Mr Trump. The Bureau, instead, seemed to be devoting their resources in the pursuit of Hillary Clinton’s email transgressions. 
The New York office, in particular, appeared to be on a crusade against Ms Clinton. Some of its agents had a long working relationship with Rudy Giuliani, by then a member of the Trump campaign, since his days as public prosecutor and then Mayor of the city.
The report notes Giuliani’s boasting in a televised interview of “a surprise or two you’re going to hear about in the next few days...a couple of things up our sleeve that should turn things around”  just prior to FBI director James Comey’s  the release of Comey’s infamous letter  reopening the Clinton e-mail investigation announcing further inquiries into Clinton e-mails. (edited to address complaints about wording in the comments)
In desperation, a “frustrated and demoralized” Steele finally turned to Mother Jones reporter David Corn in October in hopes of bringing wider attention to his investigation. However, with the FBI focusing all of its attention on Clinton’s e-mails, the Independent notes that the Corn story sparked little press interest and quickly died.
The only apparent reason that Steele’s blockbuster research has finally come to light is through the efforts of Sen. John McCain.
It was against this background that Senator John McCain, who had been hearing with growing alarm reports about Mr Trump and the Kremlin, met Sir Andrew Wood, a former British ambassador to Moscow, who had spent 10 years in Russia and is highly respected for his knowledge of Russian affairs, at a security conference in Halifax, Canada.
Sir Andrew stressed to Senator McCain that he had not read the dossier, but vouched for Mr Steele’s professionalism and integrity. The chair of the Senate Armed Forces Committee then sent an emissary to London who picked up the dossier from an intermediary acting on behalf of Mr Steele. The Senator personally took the material to Mr Comey.
It really appears that the FBI was in no hurry to look into any of the Trump team’s numerous Russian connections and may not have acted  at all if it were not for McCain pressing the issue by forcing the dossier into Comey’s hands. What an alarming  and frightening situation.
David Corn story  about his interview with Christopher Steele in October www.motherjones.com/… 
The former spy told me that he was reluctant to be talking with a reporter. He pointed out this was not his common practice. "Someone like me stays in the shadows," he said. But he indicated that he believed this material was important, and he was unsure how the FBI was handling it. Certainly, there had been no public signs that the FBI was investigating these allegations. (The FBI at the time refused to tell me if it had received the memos or if it was examining the allegations.)
"This was something of huge significance, way above party politics," the former spy told me. "I think [Trump's] own party should be aware of this stuff as well." He noted that he believed Russian intelligence's efforts aimed at Trump were part of Vladimir Putin's campaign to "disrupt and divide and discredit the system in Western democracies."










Source DailyKos.com




http://footprintsstrategies.comad

Jeff Sessions and the Long Attack on Voting Rights


This week the Senate opened its Cabinet confirmation hearings with Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions, who is almost certain to become the next attorney general. As senators and journalists alike dug into Sessions' infamous record on voting rights, The Washington Post unearthed a letter thought lost to time.
In 1986, Coretta Scott King wrote the letter to oppose Sessions' nomination to be a federal judge. Her criticism was based in part on his prosecution of the "Marion Three" for voter fraud, a case widely thought to be racially motivated. As Sessions comes before the Senate for a fresh round of inquiry, her critique is as relevant as ever. She writes:
Anyone who has used his office to intimidate and chill citizens' free exercise of the ballot should not be elevated to our courts. If confirmed, Mr. Sessions will be given tenure for doing with a federal prosecution what the local sheriffs accomplished twenty years ago with clubs and cattle prods.
I believe his confirmation would have a devastating effect on not only the judicial system, but also on the progress we have made toward fulfilling my husband's dream.
Representative John Lewis, who ended the hearing this week by testifying against the Alabama senator, echoed her criticism. Flanked by other members of the Congressional Black Caucus, Lewis reminded the Senate that "[w]e need someone as attorney general who is going to look out for all of us and not just for some of us."
In its efforts to defend Sessions, the Trump team passed out a dossier citing an article titled "How Black Democrats Stole Votes in Alabama And Jeff Sessions Tried To Stop It," written by Hans von Spakovsky.
As Jane Mayer detailed in a 2012 piece for The New Yorker, von Spakovsky has been peddling baseless myths of voter fraud and calling for voter-roll purges since at least 1997. And he has gained traction. Twenty states have enacted new voter restrictions since 2010. This year, 14 states had new restrictions in place for the first time in a presidential election.
Rep. Lewis himself said of von Spakovsky:
He's trying to create a cure where there is no sickness. He's been hellbent to make it more difficult for people to vote. I thought we'd passed this long ago — but it seems we must fight this fight over and over.
If, as Rep. Lewis says, we must indeed "fight this fight over and over," we remain inspired by the example of civil rights leaders and committed to the work ahead. The question is how long will it take to rebuild and ensure that every American has equal access to the ballot. How long?
The Editors
P.S. Here are a few other articles from this week that we think might interest you:




Source SPLC


SPLC logo




http://footprintsstrategies.comad

Blowback from the unclassified dossier on Trump Putin Treason


Decision to brief Trump on allegations brought a secret and unsubstantiated dossier into the public domain
Let it be said that the word “allegations” is key. A lot of what has been released has not been verified. It could turn out to be a mixture of truth and enough that’s not true to allow Trump to push it all aside, as he did at his news conference Wednesday. “It’s all fake news,” he said. “It’s phony stuff. It didn’t happen.”

read the UNClASSIFIED DOSSIER HERE 

But given Trump’s relentless public praise for Putin and the derision he has directed at those who mistrust Russia and its intentions (our president-elect called those who disagree with his Russia policies “stupid”), the accusations need to be dealt with very seriously and investigated meticulously. If we have learned nothing else, we know that Trump’s denials can never be believed until they are independently confirmed. The new standard for presidential statements must be: “Mistrust and verify.”

U.S. officials said Wednesday that the decision had been unanimous to attach the two-page summary of the dossier to a sweeping report on Russian election interference commissioned by the White House and briefed to Obama, Trump and congressional leaders.
But U.S. intelligence officials appear to have been caught off-guard by the fallout, including a blistering attack by Trump, who accused spy agencies of engaging in Nazi-like tactics to smear him.
In an effort to contain the damage, Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. said he spoke with Trump on Wednesday and “expressed my profound dismay at the leaks that have been appearing in the press.”
Clapper said in a statement issued late Wednesday that he told Trump that the allegations had come from a “private security company,” that U.S. spy agencies had “not made any judgment that the information in this document is reliable.”
“However, part of our obligation is to ensure that policymakers are provided with the fullest possible picture of any matters that might affect national security,” Clapper said.
A U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity said the nature of the summary “was fully explained” to Trump on Friday and “put into context.”

5 misleading moments from Trump's news conference

Play Video1:43
Washington Post Fact Checker Glenn Kessler assesses five moments from President-elect Donald Trump's Jan. 11 question-and-answer session with reporters. (Video: Sarah Parnass, Glenn Kessler/Photo: Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Chief James B. Comey and National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers all concurred that both Obama and Trump should know that U.S. spy agencies were aware of the claims about compromising information on Trump and had investigated or explored them to some degree.
U.S. officials emphasized that the summary was merely an annex to the main report, that the allegations it contained have never been substantiated and did not appear in the main body of the report or influence its conclusions that Russia sought to sabotage the 2016 race and help elect Trump.
The handling of the matter also seemed to deepen the level of distrust between Trump and the intelligence community, whose work he has repeatedly disparaged since his election victory two months ago.
In a news conference in New York, Trump blasted U.S. intelligence agencies and accused them of employing Nazi-like tactics to discredit him.
“I think it was disgraceful, disgraceful, that the intelligence agencies allowed any information that turned out to be so false and fake, out,” Trump said, referring to a burst of headlines over the past two days about the dossier. “That’s something that Nazi Germany would do and did do.”






Source Washington Post









http://footprintsstrategies.comad

How Trump Plans On Dealing With Conflict Of Interests But Not Really

UPDATE: 

Trump Attorney Is Partner In Firm Named ‘Russia Law Firm Of The Year’ 




Here is another one of Donald Trump's Dog And Pony Shows that he is so famous for
 Image result for Trump's Dog And Pony Show
Trump will shift his assets into a trust managed by his sons and give up management of his private company….
The announcement included a pledge from a Trump lawyer that the company would make “no new foreign deals whatsoever” during Trump’s presidency, and that any new domestic deals would undergo vigorous review, including approval by an independent ethics adviser.
But Trump’s commitment will not resolve what federal officials and ethics advisors say is his most key conflict: His continuing ownership of his business, the Trump Organization. That will ensure Trump will still have a vested financial interest in a global private company when he takes office next week.
Sheri Dillon, a tax advisor at Morgan Lewis, said Trump has sought to completely isolate himself from the business and “will only know of a deal if he sees it in the paper or on TV.” But he will not sell the business or his stake, adding, “President-elect Trump should not be expected to destroy the company he built.”
Take two key provisions here, the idea for a new ethics adviser that would sign off on new deals, and the pledge to “isolate” himself from the business to the degree that he won’t know about any new deals unless he reads about them in the media. The problem is obvious: Even if Trump takes these steps, and even if he does transfer his holdings into a trust managed by his sons, he still knows what his business holdings are, regardless of whether he knows about any “new” deals or whether any such new deals pass muster with his ethics adviser.
That means that much of the potential for conflicts remains in place: Trump will be making regulatory decisions impacting businesses (such as banks) that are entangled with his own. He will be setting American policy in countries where he retains holdings. Trump’s businesses could even directly benefit from Trump policies. Only full divestment would have sufficed to ward off potential conflicts in these areas.
“The Trump plan falls short in every respect,” Norm Eisen, the former ethics watchdog in the Obama administration, emailed me. “Trump did not make a clean break with his business ownership interests as his predecessors for four decades have done.”
“Trump’s ill-advised course will precipitate scandal and corruption,” Eisen added.
Making things even worse, nor did Trump make any vows of increased transparency into his holdings. Trump once again rebuffed calls to release his tax returns, which might have helped create such transparency, and didn’t announce any additional steps to provide it in any other way. This means another core problem remains: Because we aren’t privy to the full scope and range of those holdings, we simply cannot know whether such conflicts — or corruption — are taking place in any given situation.
“As long as president-elect Trump maintains ownership of his businesses, he will know when tax or regulatory or policy changes benefit his bottom line,” Noah Bookbinder, the executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, told me today. “He will also know when policy decisions will benefit him by benefiting other companies whose interests are tied up with his, or benefiting foreign countries whose interests affect his businesses.”
“Even worse, because we don’t know the scope of his interests, we won’t even know it when there’s such a situation where such a conflict is possible or happening,” Bookbinder added.













http://footprintsstrategies.comad

UPDATE: Did the entire Trump Campaign commit TREASON


UPDATE: Did the entire Trump Campaign commit TREASON

Source E, In the Dossier acknowledged that the Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), to the WikiLeaks platform. The reason for using WikiLeaks was “plausible deniability? and the operation had been conducted with the full knowledge and support of TRUMP and senior members of his campaign team. In return, the TRUMP team had agreed to sideline Russian intervention in Ukraine as a campaign issue and to raise defense commitments in the Baltics and Eastern Europe to deflect attention away from Ukraine, a priority for PUTIN who needed to cauterize the subject.”

If this particular detail of the intel report can be proven, it represents treason and it would almost certainly result in Trump’s eventual impeachment. Read the full report.

Intelligence chiefs briefed Trump and Obama on reports Russia has compromising information on president-elect


READ THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT HERE 





READ THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT HERE 










http://footprintsstrategies.comad

Is Trump being blackmailed by Russia

UPDATE: Did the entire Trump Campaign commit TREASON
Source E, In the Dossier acknowledged that the Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), to the WikiLeaks platform. The reason for using WikiLeaks was “plausible deniability? and the operation had been conducted with the full knowledge and support of TRUMP and senior members of his campaign team. In return, the TRUMP team had agreed to sideline Russian intervention in Ukraine as a campaign issue and to raise defense commitments in the Baltics and Eastern Europe to deflect attention away from Ukraine, a priority for PUTIN who needed to cauterize the subject.”

If this particular detail of the intel report can be proven, it represents treason and it would almost certainly result in Trump’s eventual impeachment. Read the full report.

Intelligence chiefs briefed Trump and Obama on reports Russia has compromising information on president-elect


READ THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT HERE 





READ THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT HERE 









http://footprintsstrategies.comad

Hillary Clinton Speaks at the Opening of State Department Pavilion

2017-01-11t001547z_1504219271_rc1adbbe0f90_rtrmadp_3_usa-diplomacy-clinton



Hillary Clinton returned to Washington, DC on Tuesday for the opening of a new exhibition area in the State Department's museum. Named in her honor, The Hillary Clinton Pavilion marks the completion of another section of the U.S. Diplomacy Center. Clinton was joined at the event by Secretary of State John Kerry and former Secretaries of State Madeleine Albright and Colin Powell. Clinton spoke briefly about the important work of the museum and its exciting future saying, "I’m excited about the historic artifacts and the cutting-edge exhibits that will be here to teach and inspire future generations about the work of our country’s diplomats. Students and visitors alike will be able to simulate high-stakes diplomatic negotiation, learn more about resolving disputes in our increasingly interconnected and interdependent world." Watch a video of Clinton's speech below.






http://footprintsstrategies.comad