Fake "$16 Muffin" Becomes Image Of Government Waste


It may not quite be “Let them eat cake,” but the new poster child for government waste has been discovered, and it’s the Department of Justice’s $16 muffins.
According to reports, after an audit of spending on conferences for the last few years, multiple costs were broken down to provide a better understanding of where the taxpayer money was going.  One line item, according to the DOJ Office of Inspector General report — $16 a piece muffins and $10 a piece cookies.
Were those just really good cookies?  Is the government really throwing around our money just like that?  Not at all, reports Kevin Drum at Mother Jones.  As anyone who has ever booked a conference knows, the “food costs” are seldom the actual cost of the item itself, but also the cost of set up, break down, gratuity, taxes, utensils and other various necessities that go along with the food being served.  As Drum says, “I’m surprised DOJ even got that much of a breakdown. Far more commonly, your event person negotiates what kind of refreshments you’ll get, and the invoice ends up looking something like this:  Refreshment table (bev/morn/aft) — 5 days………………..$39,500.”
Like NASA’s $10,000 toilet seat or the Million Dollar Space pen, these government spending myths blossom and proliferate regardless of who is in office.  But as always, the accusations cause administrations to jump to alert and crackdown on anything that could be seen as government excess.
Next time maybe they should hit the drive through instead.



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/fake-16-muffi-becomes-image-of-government-waste.html#ixzz1YmyRQebn

Breaking...House approves stopgap funding, Harry Ried will kill the poison pill Bill


The House early Friday narrowly approved a stopgap spending measure to keep the federal government running into October, as Republican leaders secured the votes of conservatives who rejected a similar bill a day earlier.
The 219-203 vote sets up a confrontation with the Senate, where Democratic leaders have vowed to block the measure in a dispute over federal disaster aid.
For Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), the vote was little more than a mulligan. After 48 Republicans opposed his bill on Wednesday, he faced a choice: Scrap a spending cut to win over Democrats who had pulled their support for the bill, or persuade dissenting conservatives that the original bill was the best deal they could get.
Boehner chose his right flank, adding a sweetener in the form of a $100 million rescission to the loan guarantee program that funded the bankrupt energy company Solyndra.
Read the complete story here.

Obama Uses Brent Spence Bridge To Pitch Jobs Bill On Boehner, McConnell Home Turf




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/22/obama-bridge-jobs-bill-boehner-mcconnell_n_975485.html




Obama Uses Brent Spence Bridge To Pitch Jobs Bill On Boehner, McConnell Home Turf









Press Widely Criticized, But Trusted More than Other Sources of Information



Negative opinions about the performance of news organizations now equal or surpass all-time highs on nine of 12 core measures the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press has been tracking since 1985. However, these bleak findings are put into some perspective by the fact that news organizations are more trusted sources of information than are many other institutions, including government and business.

Fully 66% say news stories often are inaccurate, 77% think that news organizations tend to favor one side, and 80% say news organizations are often influenced by powerful people and organizations.

The public's impressions of the national media may be influenced more by their opinions of cable news outlets than their views of other news sources, such as network or local TV news, newspapers or internet news outlets. When asked what first comes to mind when they think of "news organizations," most name a cable news outlet, with CNN and Fox News receiving the most mentions by far.

Read the full report at people-press.org for more discussion on where most Americans get their news; what Democrats, Republicans and independents think of the media's news coverage; and a detailed look at the public's positive and negative evaluations of the press.


Press Widely Criticized, But Trusted More than Other Sources of Information - Pew Research Center

Call Speaker Boehner's office now -- tell him not to let politics get in the way of creating jobs, and ask him to help make sure Congress passes the American Jobs Act.

Today, President Obama stood on the Brent Spence Bridge that connects Ohio to Kentucky and spoke about how the American Jobs Act could help rebuild that bridge and thousands like it, and put construction workers and manufacturers back to work.

It has been exactly two weeks since President Obama proposed the American Jobs Act -- a fully paid-for plan made up of ideas that both parties have endorsed in the past and ought to be able to get behind now. A wide majority of Americans who have heard about the Jobs Act want to see it passed right away.

But Congress has yet to take any action on it whatsoever.

There's no excuse for any more delays. The President is out there bringing this plan straight to the American people. It's on us to help put the pressure on Congress.

House Speaker John Boehner -- who will be leading the Republicans in negotiations -- needs to hear what Americans like you think.

Call Speaker Boehner's office now at (202) 225-0600 -- tell him not to let politics get in the way of creating jobs, and ask him to help make sure Congress passes the American Jobs Act.

Then click here to let us know how it went.

President Obama this week also outlined his plan to pay for the bill while still reducing our deficit. At the heart of the plan is the Buffett Rule, a commonsense principle that would require people earning more than $1 million a year to pay the same share of their income in taxes as middle-class families do.

If that's a proposal you think makes sense, it's time to let John Boehner hear it.

Republicans have responded to the plan with more cries of "class warfare," a term that apparently applies when the President asks millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share but not when Republicans cut urgently needed programs for middle-class families.

As the President said, this isn't class warfare -- it's simple math. If we want to reduce the deficit and put America back to work, we can't put the entire burden on the middle class. But we know that's exactly what congressional Republicans will do if we don't take action -- decimate programs seniors and families rely on, while protecting every loophole and giveaway for billionaires and big corporations.

None of us have time to sit around and wait while our lawmakers dig in for a political fight when there are reasonable solutions for creating jobs on the table right now.

As the President told Congress more a week ago, "this plan is the right thing to do right now. You should pass it. And I intend to take that message to every corner of this country. And I ask every American who agrees to lift your voice: Tell the people who are gathered here tonight that you want action now. Tell Washington that doing nothing is not an option. Remind us that if we act as one nation and one people, we have it within our power to meet this challenge."

He was talking to us, so let's do our job. Call John Boehner in Washington now -- and tell him it's time to pass this jobs bill.

GOP: Pants Are On Fire



"The first round of stimulus ... it created zero jobs."

The Massachusetts health care plan "dealt with 8 percent of our population," far less than the "100 percent of American people" affected by President Barack Obama’s health care law.

President Barack Obama "has virtually no one in his cabinet with private-sector experience."

Says President Barack Obama delivered $2 billion to Brazil to help with offshore drilling projects.

"We're inches away from no longer having a free economy."




"A clause hidden in the Obamacare bill, which is now law, gives Obama the right to form a private army."

Says a quote at the top of the redesigned website for the Department of Justice comes from a socialist who wanted to impose global common law.

Says that President Obama said, "Nobody made these guys go to war. ... Now they whine about bearing the costs of their choice?" 


Accuses President Barack Obama of making contradictory claims about efforts to kill Osama bin Laden in 2008 and 2011.

"A few months into office, (President Barack Obama) traveled around the globe to apologize for America."

"We're going to be looking at $8 billion a day that we're going to be pouring into foreign countries in order to import that make-up fuel that we're going to need to take the place of what we could have gotten out of the gulf."

"We are only inches away from ceasing to be a free market economy."

"Unions don’t have to comply with Obamacare."

Next year, "you will be mandated by federal law to get rid of your existing light bulbs."

"The Democrats have already voted to ban our conventional light bulbs ... in favor of dangerous fluorescent light bulbs."


President Obama’s health care law "represents a government takeover of health care."



Progressive Group Blitzes Republicans Gathered In Florida With ‘Let Him Die’ Moment


There’s a myriad of Republican events here this week, from aCPAC convention to a massive gathering of state GOP members to a nationally-televised presidential debate. And a group of progressives intent on preserving the 2010 health care law hopes to cast a pall over all of them with a reminder of an ugly moment from the last time the Republican candidates for president stopped off in the Sunshine State.
Protect Your Care, which has been keeping the fire burning on the “let him die” moment from the Sept. 12 tea party debate in Tampa, is turning the heat up to 11 with events and a new TV ad that will broadcast for the rest of the week in Orlando, including during Thursday’s Fox News debate.
The hard-hitting TV ad attacks the presidential contenders for their open courtship of the tea party, which Protect Your Care says is exemplified in the moment when the candidates “stood silent” while members of the audience cheered on the idea of letting an uninsured man die.

Read More...
Progressive Group Blitzes Republicans Gathered In Florida With ‘Let Him Die’ Moment | Election 2012

Politics & The Federal Reserve


The Federal Reserve board swapped hundreds of billions in short term bonds for long term bonds Wednesday.
Their goal is an economic stimulus.
The move by the Federal Reserve should keep credit card rates low, and could lower mortgage rates.
The move was made to encourage buying of goods like cars and trucks and to encourage hiring.
The Fed's move validates President Obama's call for a new stimulus, and in an unprecedented attack on the independent board, Republicans slammed the move in a letter, saying:
"The board should resist further extraordinary intervention...that may promote more borrowing by over leveraged consumers...we've seen no evidence that further monetary stimulus will create jobs."
"I think many of us feel that some of the loose monetary policy has had a negative effect as far as global confidence in our currency and ultimately in our economy," said House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.





Democrats fired back.
"Time and again the philosophy of the Republicans come through: stand by, do nothing," said Illinois Senator Dick Durbin.
Even the Federal Emergency Management Agency has become a partisan issue.
As recent floods recede available cash for the agency is drying up.
Democrats want another $6 billion.
Republicans say only if those funds are cut from something else, and that is holding up agreement on the next stop funding bill.
The fight over FEMA funding, relatively small change, could threaten a shut down of government.
Like the fight over the Fed, it's more proof of gridlock.

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT


Last week, President Obama signed a patent reform bill into law that will encourage innovation, spark job creation, and make America more competitive in the global economy.
Why are we so excited about the America Invents Act? The United States patent system hasn’t seen comprehensive reform since 1952—that’s before cell phones, laptop computers, social networking, and even nationwide all-color television broadcasts.
Patents are currently managed by the U.S. Patent and Trade Office (USPTO), which joined the President in his call for patent reform that reflects our changing economy and technological landscape.
Here’s a look at some of the problems with our current patent system—and how putting the America Invents Act into practice will update the process for the 21st century.
There are too many bad patents.
Before you can receive a patent, you need to be sure that your idea is actually innovative—meaning no one else discovered it first. You have a duty to tell the USPTO about any related inventions that you are aware of, and the USPTO will search for other examples of what is called “prior art” to make sure your invention is new.
Under the current system, this is easier said than done. The USPTO receives about 350,000 patent applications every year, and each of those applications is reviewed by a designated patent examiner. Because examiners with the USPTO don’t have expert knowledge of every single field and industry, they rely heavily on the inventor’s word to prove that the discovery is actually an innovation. This is becoming a bigger issue every day, as more and more people apply for patents in fields like computer technology and high–tech business that require highly specialized knowledge.
The America Invents Act offers a few solutions to this problem. First, the patent review process will provide more transparency and more opportunities for third parties to raise questions both during and after patent application, which will encourage feedback from experts and professionals within the field. Claimed inventions that do not deserve patents will be weeded out. Second, more stable funding of the USPTO will allow the agency to hire and keep more examiners with advanced knowledge in a variety of industries.
It’s expensive.
One of the biggest complaints about applying for a patent under the current system is that it’s very expensive. A basic filing fee for a standard application will be at least several hundred dollars. Be prepared to pay more if your application is more than 100 sheets, if you’re filing a provisional application, or even if your application has a cover page.
Why does it cost so much to apply for a patent? Patent fees are currently set by the USPTO, but Congress can decide how those fees are spent, in a process called “fee diversion.” The America Invents Act changes the process so that the USPTO can set its own fees based on the actual amount of work required for each type of patent, and it will keep the revenue from patent applications to improve the process.
It takes too long.
Once you’ve filed a patent application, be prepared to wait—to the tune of almost three years, which is the average time between filing and a decision from the USPTO. That’s because the office is currently sitting on a backlog of nearly 700,000 patent applications.
The America Invents Act speeds up the process by increasing the number and experience of patent examiners at the USPTO. It also introduces a major change in the way we apply for patents: from the “first to invent” to a “first to file” system. Under the current process, the rightful owner is the first inventor—which is often difficult to prove and encourages false claims. The new “first to file” system gives ownership to the first person to apply for a patent, which is easier to determine. It also increases the pool of public knowledge by encouraging people to file for patents quickly.
Why are patents good for the economy?
The America Invents Act is part of President Obama’s strategy to encourage innovation, create jobs, and support our country’s entrepreneurs and small businesses. Granting a patent to a worthy invention encourages the kind of innovation and discovery that fuel America’s economy. Making sure our patent office quickly weeds out the undeserving applications prevents bad patents from becoming a drain on industry. American innovation has flourished with a strong patent system, and the America Invents Act will make sure that the U.S. patent system keeps America on the cutting edge of innovation for years to come.