Donald Trump didn't want to be president

Donald Trump didn't want to be president, the former communications director of a now-closed super PAC writes in an open letter to his supporters, but "his pride is too out of control to stop him now."

"You can give Trump the biggest gift possible if you are a Trump supporter: stop supporting him," writes Stephanie Cegielski in the letter, posted through the website xoJane.

Cegielski writes that she was called to Trump Tower last year to add her public experience to help the polling numbers for Trump's candidacy, which had been initially staged as a "protest" to reach double digits, and ended up working for the Make America Great Again super PAC. 

"The Trump camp would have been satisfied to see him pulling at 12 percent and taking second place to a candidate who might hold 50 percent," she said. "His candidacy was a protest candidacy."

And, she said that she doesn't dismiss any of Trump's supporters, but she believes it's important to let them know that he "does not know policy, nor does he have the humility to admit what he does not know — the most frightening position of all."
"Does Trump think that he is making a cameo on Wrestlemania (yes, one of his actual credits)?" she wrote. "This is not how foreign policy works. For anyone. Ever. Superhero powers where 'I alone can solve' problems are not real. They do not exist for Batman, for Superman, for Wrestlemania and definitely not for Donald Trump."




Source NewsMax.com

Lunatic Pastor Goes On D.C. Rampage



 A man with a gun was shot by police yesterday afternoon at the U.S. Capitol’s Visitor Complex. "Authorities identified the wounded suspect as Larry Russell Dawson, a minister from Tennessee. The 66-year-old Dawson previously was arrested in October in the District after he allegedly disrupted Congress by shouting that he was a 'prophet of God,'" report Peter Hermann, Clarence Williams and Ian Shapira. "Police said Dawson walked into the visitor center about 2:40 p.m. Monday and was going through security screening when at least one officer opened fire. In the chaotic moments that followed, loudspeaker alerts warned tourists in the center of an 'active shooter,' and officers yelled at people to get down. 'My husband said he heard a shot followed by a full clip,' said Diane Bilo of Ohio, who was in the cafeteria as her husband and two of their children were in the visitor center."
  • Monday night, police said Dawson had been charged with assault with a deadly weapon and assault on a police officer while armed. They said he was in stable but critical condition and would appear in D.C. Superior Court after his release from the hospital.
  • Two officials familiar with the case said Dawson was shot in the chest and thigh.
  • U.S. Capitol Police Chief Matthew R. Verderosa: "There is no reason to believe this is anything more than a criminal act.”
  • "No officers were injured, but a female bystander between 35 and 45 years old suffered what appeared to be a minor injury and was taken to a hospital, the chief said, without elaborating on how she had been hurt. Two police officials said she had a wound on her face that they believe was caused by a bullet fragment."

REMARKS BY THE FIRST LADY AND SOLEDDAD O’BRIEN DURING A GIRLS’ EDUCATION DISCUSSION WITH CUBAN STUDENTS

REMARKS BY THE FIRST LADY
AND SOLEDDAD O’BRIEN
DURING A GIRLS’ EDUCATION DISCUSSION
WITH CUBAN STUDENTS

Fabrica de Arte
Havana, Cuba

10:52 A.M. CST


              MS. O’BRIEN:  So hi, everyone.  Me llamo Soledad, and I’m a journalist.  And my mother is Cuban, and grew up not very far from here.  I spend a lot of time telling stories, and sometimes they’re stories about tough things -- like the color of our skin and the things that challenge us, and also the things that inspire us, and how we overcome our limits.

              I started a foundation that helps young ladies about your age -- for young girls who might need some guidance and help and support.  It’s called Starfish Foundation, and we help pay for girls to go to school.  Because in America, school, college is pretty expensive.

              You may know that there are 62 million girls in the world who don’t have access to education.  And sometimes, one of the big things they lack is support and guidance to get through.  And one of the things that has inspired me about what Mrs. Obama does is that this is a real focus -- Let Girls Learn.  Because it’s not just about can you do the work in school, it’s also about can you handle the stress and the emotion -- and sometimes the emotional guidance you need.

              Mrs. Obama went to one of the best universities in the United States.  But she’s talked in the past about, while she could do the work, it was the emotional stress that was really hard, navigating that.  And it’s one of the things that has influenced Let Girls Learn, and some of the other programs that we’ll talk about today.  I want her to talk about her experiences personally, and then also what she’s learned as she’s spoken to young women not just here in Cuba, but around the globe. 

              So that’s a little bit of a long introduction, but without any further ado, let me introduce you to the First Lady of the United States of America, Michelle Obama.

              MRS. OBAMA:  Thank you, Soledad.  And thank you for agreeing to moderate today’s panel.

              MS. O’BRIEN:  My pleasure.

              MRS. OBAMA: We are proud to have you and your family with us. 

              MS. O’BRIEN:  Thank you.

              MRS. OBAMA:  But I’m not going to talk too long, because I want to make sure that we have a wonderful conversation.  And later on, we’re going to open this up so that you can ask any questions of me and learn however much you want during this conversation.

              But as I’ve traveled around the world as First Lady, one of the things that I always try to do on my visits is to talk to young people, particularly young girls.  As the mother of two beautiful young ladies who are about your age -- who you’ll get a chance to meet today -- and also as an individual who was herself a young minority growing up and trying to do her best, I know how important it is and how challenging it can be for young girls to understand the importance of education, to fight through all the stereotypes, and to make sure that we have access to all the resources and all the emotional support we need to be successful.

              So when I hear that there are 62 million girls worldwide that don’t have the opportunity to get an education, it is an outrage for me personally.  And the reasons these girls are not in school are many and varied.  Sometimes they’re not in school because they can’t afford school fees.  Sometimes they’re not in school because they don’t have access to school, and they have to travel for miles, long distances to get to school.  And sometimes there are just social and cultural norms in their countries and their villages that say that young girls aren’t worthy of an education, but they should be married off at an early age, have children as teenagers, and spend most of their time doing household chores.

              But what we do know -- and the studies are clear -- is that when women and girls get an education, their families, their countries all prosper as a result.  So as part of Let Girls Learn, one of the things that I want to do is build a worldwide army of young women who are out there building awareness around these challenges -- and as you all grow and become young professionals, that you keep this in mind, and that this becomes an issue that we’re all working to improve as we go out there and become whoever we’re going to become in the world.

              All of you are amazing role models, and that’s one of the reasons why I wanted to spend some time with you.  I want to hear about your lives.  I want to hear about your hopes and dreams.  And we also brought questions from young people just like you in the United States who are so excited about the relationship between our two countries.  And they have many, many questions that they want to know.  So hopefully this will be a conversation, and I’m excited to hear everything you all have to say.

              So don’t be nervous.  I know that’s hard to say in all of this, but hopefully this will be fun for all of us.

              MS. O’BRIEN:  Okay.  Let’s begin with introductions.  Will you start for me?

              STUDENT:  (As interpreted.)  Hello.  I’m Evelyn. I’m 17 years old.  I worked at the university college -- I’m studying, sorry, at the university college.  And last year, I was part of an exchange program in the United States.

              STUDENT:  (As interpreted.)  Good morning.  I’m Laura.  I’m 18 years old.  I was also part of a science camp in the United States, and I’m also a college student.

              STUDENT:  (As interpreted.)  Good morning.  I’m Marian.  I’m 19 years old.  I’m also about to start a program in the social communications college at the Havana University.  And just like Evelyn, I was part of an exchange program in the United States.

              STUDENT:  Hello.  My name is Jessica.  I’m 20 years old.  I study violin at ISA, and I was part of an interchange between orchestras in the United States.

              STUDENT:  (As interpreted.)  Good morning.  I’m Liz Maryam.  I’m 17 years old.  I’m studying accounting at the Antonio Guiteras School.  And I was part of a science camp in (inaudible.)

              STUDENT:  Good morning to you all.  My name is Gabriela.  I’m 19 years old, and I study physics at the University of Havana.  And I went last summer to some project at the United States for study.
             
              STUDENT:  Good morning.  My name is Rocio.  I’m 16 years old, and I’m studying at the José Miguel Péres High School.

              STUDENT:  Hi.  I’m Talia.  I am 15 years old, and I study piano in the National School of Arts.

              STUDENT:  Good morning.  My name is Anette.  I’m 21 years old, and I’m studying industrial design.
             
              STUDENT:  It’s a pleasure having you here.  My name is Lisa.  I’m 18 years old, and I’m a student at San Alejandro’s Academy.  It is a fine arts school and I’m -- painting specialty.

              MS. O’BRIEN:  Excellent.  Well, welcome. 

              MRS. OBAMA: Yay!  (Applause.)

              MS. O’BRIEN:  Let’s begin with our first question.  Our first question comes from Chippewa Middle School.  And I’m going to play the question, and then we’ll have you translate.

              Q           (As interpreted.)  How many and what kind of classes do you take in Cuba?

              STUDENT:  Well, first of all, in Cuba, the classes are for free, I’d like to point that.  And we have a basic and mandatory also, school -- information, which is until ninth grade.  So in that period, you have all kind of stuff.  I mean, science and physics and whatever, but also (inaudible) and political culture.  Anything you need.  It’s just basic. 

              From that point on, you can either choose to study at the technical studies, or you can get into college or the university.  It depends on what you want, and also your development through the school.

              MRS. OBAMA:  I was going to ask, do the grades mirror the grades in the United States?  So in ninth grade, are you sort of roughly 15, 16 years old?  It’s the same -- so at a pretty young age, you start to specialize in your field?

              STUDENT:  You can do that, or you can just go to college with three more years.  And then you can choose to study at the university. 

              MS. O’BRIEN:  So college here is what we would consider the upper levels of high school in the United States, right?  So in some schools -- I mean, I’m sure your daughters get to pick the classes that -- some of the classes they want to take.  I’d be curious if you guys do.

              STUDENT:  I mean, until ninth grade, you can’t.  It’s just the basic information.  But, as I said earlier, from that point on, you can specialize in music or whatever you want to study, and the -- technique, career, or whatever.  But if you choose also the high school, those three years will be also more basic things.  And then you can get into the university, which is the specific career you want.

              MS. O’BRIEN:  Should we move to our second question?  Since you mentioned music, let’s listen to the second question -- from Boyertown High School.

              Q           Hi, I’m Liz.  I’m the upright bassist at Boyertown Senior High, in their jazz band.  And I was wondering what kind of musical opportunities do you guys have in Cuba?

              MS. O’BRIEN:  Jessica, you mentioned that you’re a violinist, yes?  Can you answer that?

              STUDENT:  Well, either -- if you choose to dedicate your life to music or not in basic school, which is free, you have the opportunity to learn everything you need to know to develop music as a hobby in cultural centers with our instructors.  But if your choice is to dedicate your life to music, then you have to apply to a music school at early ages.  The age depends on the instrument.

              A minor instrument -- you always have to play piano.  And the main one is up to you.  And there are three levels -- basic, primary and secondary school; intermediate, high school; and then university.  And when you graduate, you can play in orchestras, quartets.  You can teach, or do opera, ballet and present your -- at festivals, concerts. 

              MRS. OBAMA: How old were you when you knew you wanted to pursue music?

              STUDENT:  Well, I always wanted to study music.  The instrument I wanted to play was harp, but here there’s only one teacher, so I chose violin.

              MRS. OBAMA:  And you were how old when you --

              STUDENT:  Eight years.

              MRS. OBAMA:  You were eight years old, at the wise old age of eight.

              MS. O’BRIEN:  Will you go on to university?

              STUDENT:  I’m in university now.

              MS. O’BRIEN:  And so when you get out of university, what will you do?

              STUDENT:  I’d love to play in an orchestra.

                                                                                      END                                        11:12 A.M. CST

Leprechaun Fossil Found

Fossilized Pre-Human Creature Lived 3.67 Million Years Ago

Fossilized Pre-Human Creature Lived 3.67 Million Years Ago
Scientists also announced an earlier time frame than previously estimated for the lifetime of an early proto-human dubbed Little Foot – as much as 3.67 million years ago. The nearly complete fossilized skeleton of the small Australopithecus creature was found in Sterkfontein Cave in South Africa in the 1990s.
Age estimates of the fossil have varied greatly over the years, but new dating methods have allowed a more precise estimate. ‘It was impossible to fit Little Foot into the human family tree with any certainty because “ever since its discovery, the age of Little Foot has been debated,” said lead study author Darryl Granger, a geochronologist at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. ‘If researchers can figure out when Little Foot arose, they might be able to better pinpoint which Australopithecus species and which part of Africa ultimately gave rise to Homo.’
By: Ancient-Origins

Who Is Chief Judge Merrick Garland



In a Rose Garden ceremony today at the White House, President Obama announced his intent to nominate Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court of the United States. Merrick Garland, the Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, has more federal judicial experience than any other Supreme Court nominee in history. No one is better suited to immediately serve on the Supreme Court.

Throughout his career, Chief Judge Garland has shown a rare ability to bring people together and has earned the respect of everyone he has worked with. Chief Justice John Roberts, Garland’s colleague on the D.C. Circuit, once said that “anytime Judge Garland disagrees, you know you’re in a difficult area.” In 2010, as the Senate was beginning the process of confirming a successor to Justice John Paul Stevens, Senator Orrin Hatch said he saw Chief Judge Garland as “a consensus nominee” for the Supreme Court, adding “I have no doubts that Garland would get a lot of [Senate] votes.  And I will do my best to help him get them.”

Chief Judge Garland was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit 76-23, with majority support from both Republicans and Democrats. He has served for 19 years on that court – often considered the most important appellate court in the nation. For over 3 years, he has been the Chief Judge of the D.C. Circuit, continuing to distinguish himself as one of the most impressive judges in the country. He has cultivated a reputation as a brilliant, meticulous judge with a knack for building consensus, playing it straight, and deciding every case based on what the law requires. As he has said, “The role of the court is to apply the law to the facts of the case before it—not to legislate, not to arrogate to itself the executive power, not to hand down advisory opinions on the issues of the day.”

Chief Judge Garland was born and raised in Illinois, by a mother who served as a community volunteer and a father who ran a small business out of the family home. His grandparents immigrated to the United States to escape persecution and find a better life.  He won scholarships to attend Harvard University – where he graduated summa cum laude – and Harvard Law School, paying his way by taking a summer job as a shoe store stock clerk, selling his comic book collection and counseling undergraduates.

Chief Judge Garland began his career as a clerk for legendary Second Circuit Judge Henry Friendly and then Supreme Court Justice William Brennan. In just four years, Chief Judge Garland became a partner at a prominent law firm, with a practice focused on litigation and pro bono representation of disadvantaged Americans.

Throughout his career, Chief Judge Garland has demonstrated a commitment to putting his country first. In 1989, shortly after becoming a partner in private practice, Chief Judge Garland accepted a significant pay cut to became a federal prosecutor for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for D.C. under the Administration of President George H.W. Bush, where he investigated and prosecuted cases involving public corruption, drug trafficking and fraud. U.S. Attorney Jay Stephens, a Republican appointee, later described Garland’s service to that office as marked “by dedication, sound judgment, excellent legal ability, a balanced temperament, and the highest ethical and professional standards.” 

He later was selected as the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division at the Department of Justice, and then as Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General. In these roles, he oversaw some of the most important federal criminal cases brought by the Department. 

Chief Judge Garland’s work on the Oklahoma City bombing case was particularly notable and inspiring. In the wake of the bombing, he traveled to Oklahoma to oversee the case, and in the ensuing months coordinated every aspect of the government’s response – working with federal agents, rescue workers, local officials, and others to bring the perpetrators to justice. He also kept in close touch with victims and their families throughout the case, and for several years afterwards as well. Later, former Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating, a Republican, wrote that, during his work on the Oklahoma City bombing case, Chief Judge Garland “distinguished himself in a situation where he had to lead a highly complicated investigation and make quick decisions during critical times.”

Chief Judge Garland has also devoted himself to being a mentor and teacher.  He remains close with his law clerks throughout their careers, encouraging them to pursue public service and advising them on how best to do so. In addition, for almost twenty years, he has tutored second, third, and fourth grade students in Northeast DC in reading and math. Chief Judge Garland and his wife of nearly thirty years, Lynn, have two daughters, Becky and Jessie. The family enjoys skiing, hiking and canoeing, and together they have visited many of America’s national parks.

Biography

Merrick Garland is the chief judge of the most important federal appeals court in the nation.  In this role, he has consistently forged consensus among judges across the ideological spectrum, and he is uniquely poised to serve immediately as a Supreme Court justice.

Born and raised in Illinois by a mother who served as a community volunteer and a father who ran a small business out of the family home, Garland was valedictorian of his public high school class.  He won scholarships to attend Harvard University, where he graduated summa cum laude, and Harvard Law School, where he received his law degree magna cum laude and served on the Harvard Law Review.  While in college, Garland worked a summer job as a shoe store stock clerk and sold his comic book collection to help pay his tuition.  As a law student, he earned room and board by counseling undergraduates.

After law school, Garland clerked for legendary Second Circuit Judge Henry Friendly.  Garland then clerked for Supreme Court Justice William Brennan.  Garland became a partner at a prominent law firm in just four years, with a practice focusing on litigation and pro bono representation of disadvantaged Americans.  In 1989, shortly after becoming a partner, he returned to public service by accepting a job as a federal prosecutor during the George H.W. Bush Administration, investigating and trying cases involving public corruption, drug trafficking, and fraud. 

He later joined the Department of Justice, first as Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division and then as Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General.  In these roles, he oversaw some of the Department’s most significant prosecutions in the 1990s, including coordinating the government’s response to the Oklahoma City bombing.  Garland moved to Oklahoma in the days following that terrorist attack, and led the investigation and prosecution that ultimately brought Timothy McVeigh to justice.  He also supervised the Department’s responses to the Unabomber and the Montana Freemen. 

When Garland was nominated to the D.C. Circuit, Garland received overwhelming bipartisan praise from Senators, lawyers, and commentators, and was confirmed by a vote of 76-23 in 1997.  In his 19 years on the D.C. Circuit, Garland has a track record of building consensus as a thoughtful, fair-minded judge who follows the law.  In his confirmation process, Chief Justice Roberts noted, “Any time Judge Garland disagrees, you know you’re in a difficult area.”  Senator Orrin Hatch, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee at the time of Garland’s confirmation, has said Garland would be a “consensus nominee” for the Supreme Court who “would be very well supported by all sides.”  Garland became Chief Judge in 2013.

Garland and his wife of nearly 30 years, Lynn, have two daughters, Becky and Jessie. The family enjoys skiing, hiking and canoeing, and together they have visited many of America’s national parks.  Garland is known for mentoring his clerks, and since 1998, has volunteered as a tutor for elementary school students in Northeast Washington, D.C. 

Additional Background

Sen. Hatch: “[Obama] could easily name Merrick Garland, who is a fine man.” [NewsMax, 3/13/16]

Reuters: “Senator Orrin Hatch said he had known [Garland], seen as a leading contender for the Supreme Court, for years and that he would be ‘a consensus nominee.’” [Reuters, 5/6/10

Sen. Leahy: “What Senators ought to be talking about is the fact that Merrick Garland is a superb nominee. He has been seen as a superb nominee by Republicans and Democrats alike, by all writers in this field. At a time when some seem to want people who are not qualified, here is a person with qualifications that are among the best I have ever seen.” [Congressional Record, 3/19/97]
 
Chief Justice John G. Roberts: “Any time Judge Garland disagrees, you know you're in a difficult area. And the function of his dissent, to make us focus on what we were deciding and to make sure that we felt we were doing the right thing, I think was well-served. But Judge Garland disagreed, and so it's obviously, to me, a case on which reasonable judges can disagree.” [Transcript: Day Three of the Roberts Confirmation Hearings,9/14/05]

Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad: “I am writing to ask your support and assistance in the confirmation process for a second cousin… Merrick Garland has had a distinguished legal career.” [Letter from Gov. Terry Branstad to Sen. Chuck Grassley, 10/10/1995 via Congressional Record, 3/19/97]

Former Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating: “Last April, in Oklahoma City, Merrick was at the helm of the Justice Department's investigation following the bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal Building, the bloodiest and most tragic act of terrorism on American soil. During the investigation, Merrick distinguished himself in a situation where he had to lead a highly complicated investigation and make quick decisions during critical times. Merrick Garland is an intelligent, experienced and evenhanded individual.” [Letter from Gov. Frank Keating to Sen. Bob Dole, 2/19/1996 via Congressional Record, 3/19/97]

Ed Whelan, former Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice and former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia: “He's earned the respect of a range of folks, including conservatives, and I think he is the most likely to exercise judicial restraint.”[Washington Post, 4/23/10]

Charles J. Cooper, Assistant AG for the Office Of Legal Counsel in the Reagan Administration: “Not only is Merrick enormously gifted intellectually, but he is thoughtful as well, for he respects other points of view and fairly and honestly assesses the merits of all sides of an issue. And he has a stable, even-tempered, and courteous manner. He would comport himself on the bench with dignity and fairness.” [Letter from Charles J. Cooper to Sen. Orrin Hatch, 11/9/1995 via Congressional Record, 3/19/97]
 
Former Associate Attorney General Jay B. Stephens: “In sum, his service as an Assistant United States Attorney was marked by dedication, sound judgment, excellent legal ability, a balanced temperament, and the highest ethical and professional standards. These are qualities which I believe he would bring to the bench as well.” [Letter from Jay B. Stephens to Sen. Chuck Grassley, 11/28/1995 via Congressional Record, 3/19/97]

Curt Levey, Executive Director of the Committee For Justice: “You’ll have, if not a love fest, something close to it if [the choice is] a Garland.” [NY Mag, 4/23/2010]

Carrie Severino, Chief Counsel and Policy Director to the Judicial Crisis Network: “But of those the President could nominate, we could do a lot worse than Merrick Garland… He's the best scenario we could hope for to bring the tension and the politics in the city down a notch for the summer.” [Washington Post, 4/23/10]

Essential new analyses from Stan Greenberg and Ruy Teixeira

Image result for polling graph

There are two new analyses and a dramatic policy statement by a major progressive organization that are absolutely required reading for all progressives and Democrats.
The first is an interview with Ruy Teixeira in which Ruy mobilizes the data from his latest deep analysis of political demography to directly tackle the central question of the day: Can Donald Trump actually mobilize a right-wing coalition large enough to win a general election?

The second analysis comes from Stan Greenberg's Democracy Corps. As Democracy Corps describes it: "This new survey of Republican voters shows they are headed towards a train-wreck that will change our politics. That may seem like hyperbole, but this unique, one of kind survey is an eye opening glimpse into what is really happening. With the GOP's battles alienating large swaths of the country and an internal civil war in full swing, the 2016 campaign is full of opportunity for progressives."
The GOP Civil War & Its Opportunities: Report from Republican Party Project Survey

Finally, Markos Moulitsas, publisher of Daily Kos, announces a dramatic new policy for the leading progressive website. Responding to the failure of many extreme Clinton and Sanders supporters to follow the positive example of mutual respect and Democratic unity set by Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton themselves, Kos asserts that "I will no longer tolerate malicious attacks that copy the Right's hate-fueled media machine" and backs the policy with the threat to ban violators from posting on the site.


We believe you will find these analyses both useful and important.

Sincerely,

Ed Kilgore
Managing Editor
The Democratic Strategist

MITT: TRUMP A ‘PHONY’ WITH NO JUDGMENT



Former presidential candidate Mitt Romney is expected to call Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump a “phony" during his Thursday morning speech at the University of Utah. According to excerpts obtained by the Associate Press, the former Massachusetts governor will argue that Trump’s campaign promises “are as worthless as a degree from Trump University,” which has been under investigation for fraud. Romney is also set to say Trump “has neither the temperament nor the judgment to be president.” As he is wont to do, Trump fired back early Thursday with a series of tweets, asking, “Why did Mitt Romney BEG me for my endorsement four years ago?” and “I am the only one who can beat Hillary Clinton. I am not a Mitt Romney, who doesn’t know how to win. Hillary wants no part of Trump.” Just last week, Romney told Fox News that the real-estate mogul has been “aggressive in avoiding any discussion of taxes” and likely is hiding a “bombshell” in his tax returns. Romney has not yet endorsed a presidential candidate, but recently began to speak out against the frontrunner.










source  thedailybeast.com

Robots are coming to take Republicans’ jobs



Robots are coming to take Republicans’ jobs.
The metropolitan areas that tend to vote for the GOP also have higher rates of “routine” jobs that can be accomplished by following a simple set of rules — the same jobs that have the highest risk of automation.

TODAY IS SUPER TUESDAY! WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:

TODAY IS SUPER TUESDAY!

HAVE QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS VOTING?

CALL 844-IM4-HILL (844-464-4455)


HEADLINES

Univision: Hillary Clinton: Our immigration system is broken—and it’s up to us to fix it
“And while we fight for comprehensive reform, we also have to defend and build on President Obama’s executive actions protecting DREAMers and others, so that they can live without fear of deportation.
"This is a challenge that evokes great passions on all sides. But the answer is not to build more walls or separate more families. We need to make smart investments that keep families together and protect the human rights and dignity of immigrant communities. Our immigration system is broken—but not beyond repair. It’s within our power to fix it.”
TIME: Rep. Joaquin Castro: Hillary Clinton's Vision for America Is About Inclusion
“Julián and I feel blessed with opportunity, and fundamentally believe we are living the American Dream. Ours is an immigrant story turned American story; it began with our grandmother and continues through our mother, ourselves and our children. With Clinton as president, I’m confident that citizens and aspiring citizens nationwide will fulfill their own Americans Dreams. That’s why Clinton, above all candidates, has earned my support.”
CNN: Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed: Why I'm backing Hillary Clinton
“Clinton's career has been defined by standing up for those who have been left behind. She's the right choice for Atlanta, for Georgia, and for our entire country.”
POLITICO: Massachusetts poll: Clinton leads Sanders by 8
“Hillary Clinton leads Bernie Sanders by eight points in Massachusetts a day before Super Tuesday, according to the results of a new Suffolk University poll released Monday, which does not exactly portend good things for the Vermont senator's electoral chances in the New England state.”
 
"We get it. We millennials are idealistic and many are drawn to Sanders’ pie-in-the-sky proposals—but let’s show the world that we’re realistic, too, by backing a candidate whose proposals are not just pro-people and (moderately) progressive but are also actually workable. Let’s recognize that we need someone like Hillary to break through bipartisan gridlock to lead the country. And we’d like to read that story in the media, too."